<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retraction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.willdonnelly.net/2009/01/15/retraction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.willdonnelly.net/2009/01/15/retraction/</link>
	<description>Coding, Mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:51:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: We Need An R5.1RS &#171; It Seemed Like A Good Idea, At The Time</title>
		<link>http://blog.willdonnelly.net/2009/01/15/retraction/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>We Need An R5.1RS &#171; It Seemed Like A Good Idea, At The Time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willdonnelly.wordpress.com/?p=178#comment-47</guid>
		<description>[...] that implementation detection and redefining the load function are tasks eminently better fitted to an external library than to a modification to the core language.  While I still believe that Unicode and Unix shebangs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that implementation detection and redefining the load function are tasks eminently better fitted to an external library than to a modification to the core language.  While I still believe that Unicode and Unix shebangs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
