<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Solving Logic Grid Puzzles in Haskell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.willdonnelly.net/2009/11/06/solving-logic-grid-puzzles-in-haskell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.willdonnelly.net/2009/11/06/solving-logic-grid-puzzles-in-haskell/</link>
	<description>Coding, Mostly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 20:08:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Schade</title>
		<link>http://blog.willdonnelly.net/2009/11/06/solving-logic-grid-puzzles-in-haskell/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Schade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 22:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willdonnelly.wordpress.com/?p=314#comment-88</guid>
		<description>You know I&#039;m partial to Python, so when I saw &lt;a href=&quot;http://pastebin.com/f41c6cbf8&quot; title=&quot;A Python Solution&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a Python solution&lt;/a&gt; (linked in the comments to the above comment by &lt;em&gt;programmingpraxis&lt;/em&gt;), I was rather excited.

And then I noticed the beauty of yours versus the inelegance of the Python version. Unlike yours, the Python version fails to abstract the solving code, instead embedding the puzzle in the code itself. With your attempt above, I could quite easily have it solve my own puzzle by touching only the rules, not the actual logic code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know I&#8217;m partial to Python, so when I saw <a href="http://pastebin.com/f41c6cbf8" title="A Python Solution" rel="nofollow">a Python solution</a> (linked in the comments to the above comment by <em>programmingpraxis</em>), I was rather excited.</p>
<p>And then I noticed the beauty of yours versus the inelegance of the Python version. Unlike yours, the Python version fails to abstract the solving code, instead embedding the puzzle in the code itself. With your attempt above, I could quite easily have it solve my own puzzle by touching only the rules, not the actual logic code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: programmingpraxis</title>
		<link>http://blog.willdonnelly.net/2009/11/06/solving-logic-grid-puzzles-in-haskell/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>programmingpraxis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://willdonnelly.wordpress.com/?p=314#comment-87</guid>
		<description>You might enjoy my solution at &lt;a href=&quot;http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/06/16/who-owns-the-zebra/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Programming Praxis&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might enjoy my solution at <a href="http://programmingpraxis.com/2009/06/16/who-owns-the-zebra/" rel="nofollow">Programming Praxis</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
